chevron icon Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo YouTube logo download icon link icon audio icon quote icon posted icon clock icon author icon arrow icon arrow icon plus icon Search icon location icon location icon document icon menu icon plus-alt
Inamori Forum

Registration opens

In-person participants will be able to register at the reception of the Blavatnik School of Government building and enjoy tea, coffee and pastries with other in-person attendees and speakers.

Governance & institutional logics in outcomes-focused partnerships

Seminar Rooms 1&2

SIB partnerships feature the collaboration of stakeholders from different sectors with individual institutional logics. Likewise, SIBs are implemented across different welfare regimes, potentially influencing how the different logics play out in a SIB. This session seeks to explore how tensions between the different institutional logics are mitigated within a SIB partnership, using a comparative lens of different welfare regimes across Europe.

Watch the recording of the session here.

Presentations

Results of the Social Impact Bonds “Strengthening Prevention in Family Assistance Programmes in the District of Osnabrück” and “Improving Educational Opportunities for Children in the City of Mannheim” in Germany

Bertelsmann Stiftung initiated two Social Impact Bonds in Germany in 2017 with the goals of “Strengthening Prevention in Family Assistance Programmes in the District of Osnabrück” and “Improving Educational Opportunities …

Welfare states between tradition and innovation: Opportunities and challenges of establishing innovative financing instruments using the example of social impact bonds

Governing authorities alone are not able to solve the great challenges of our times. Social Impact Bonds (SIB), a financing instrument in which (private) donors invest in social projects, have …

The controversial relationship between public value and social impact bonds: Insights from an Italian social innovation program

This study is framed within the public management stream of studies in an attempt to investigate the potential role in creating (or destroying) public value through social impact investing schemes, …

Can the use of outcomes-based contracts lead to the implementation of more effective HIV services?

Introduction

This paper responds to the second theme of the 2022 Social Outcomes Conference exploring the governance and leadership arrangements of outcomes-based contracting through a qualitative case study of the …

Governance as a moderator to institutional pluralism in public service networks

Nonprofit organisations (NPOs) are frequently part of multi-sectoral networks delivering public services. These cross-sector collaborations feature, due to partner diversity (Huxham & Beech, 2003), multiple institutional logics. These logics are …

Theme: Outcomes-based contracting

Roundtable 2.1 Evidence and practical insights from the UK’s Life Chances Fund projects

Lecture Theatre I

Launched in 2016 by the UK Government, the Life Chances Fund (LCF) is a £70m fund which aims to help those people in society who face the most significant barriers to leading happy and productive lives. It contributes to outcome payments for locally commissioned social outcomes contracts which involve socially-minded investors through impact bonds. Running until 2025, the LCF aims to support over 51,000 individuals to achieve better life outcomes in areas such as health, employment, and housing.

All funded projects are now in implementation, with a wealth of learning coming out of delivery. This provides an exciting opportunity to celebrate what the projects have achieved so far, reflect on lessons learnt and explore how these achievements can be sustained beyond the life of the impact bond.

You can find out more about the Government Outcomes Lab's role in evaluating the LCF here.

The Roundtable will be an opportunity to explore with LCF project stakeholders the successes and lessons learnt so far from the delivery of these innovative projects; reflect on key questions around sustaining the impact of these projects beyond the LCF; and offer projects a platform to showcase their results and learn from each other.

For the session, we are seeking to bring together emerging insights from the research conducted by the GO Lab with practical insights from projects themselves, in an interactive discussion centred around three core topics:

  • Unlocking collaboration at local level & empowering civil society
  • The value added of outcome-focused partnership working
  • Sustainability beyond the life of the impact bond

For those attending the Roundtable in person, the session will be followed by informal networking for an opportunity to connect directly with peers from other Life Chances Fund projects, as well as representatives from the National Lottery Community Fund and the Department for Digital, Media, Culture & Sport.

Watch the recording of the session here.

Theme: Outcomes measurement & value for money

Roundtable 2.2 Balancing act: measuring what matters in outcomes-based partnerships

Tun Razak Lecture Theatre

It is widely accepted that setting out the intended outcomes for people targeted by a social programme provides a useful articulation of the ultimate aim of that programme. But does that mean these outcomes should be measured quantitatively? And how should those numbers be used during ‘live running’?

This roundtable will explore the range of information that cross-sector partners should use to course-correct during programme delivery, and inform practice beyond. ‘Measurement for learning’ sounds like a good idea, but how do you make people do it? How accurate do your measures need to be? And who gets to see the information and make the decisions?

Watch the recording of the sessionhere.

Presentations

How do you evaluate early stage social innovation? The case of the Greater Manchester Homes Partnership Social Impact Bond

The term rigorous evaluation is most commonly associated with research designs that have strong counter-factual evaluation designs: both randomized control trials and quasi-experimental designs. Such designs require adequate sample size …

Addressing youth homelessness across Greater Manchester through an outcomes approach

The Young Person Homeless Prevention Pathfinder is an outcomes partnership established to prevent homelessness amongst young people across Greater Manchester. The service has been delivered since January 2021, first as …

Pacific Whānau Ora Commissioning: Improving social outcomes for Pacific families in New Zealand

Pasifika Futures is a non-governmental charitable company, commissioning social outcomes for Pacific families across New Zealand through an innovative, culturally anchored programme called Whānau Ora. Our focus in Pasifika Futures …

Critical components to support outcomes-focused partnerships

While most policy makers, political representatives as well as service providers agree in principle that a strive to define and organise their work towards improved outcomes is the right way …

Measuring outcomes of results-based financing programs in the skills-for-employment space: should outcome funders pay for observed results or verified impact?

Third-party evaluation is a critical component of the results-based financing (RBF) model given the disbursement of funds is tied to the verification of outcomes. The reliability of evaluation results is …

Social Impact Bonds as an innovation-creating organisation : empirical study of service implementation

While all SIBs are outcomes-based, there are also some SIBs, whose performance will consider the service delivered. This latter category of SIBs is designed when SIBs claim to test the …

How can creation of evidence be balanced with effectiveness of social intervention in outcome-based contracts: Case study analysis of preventive healthcare projects in Japan from the viewpoint of comparison in the UK context

The sluggish economy and fiscal crunch has caused the increased interest of outcome-based contracts including social impact bond (SIB) in Japan, especially since 2015. National government has learned lessons from …

Inamori Forum

Break

Theme: Measuring outcomes & value for money

Data with a purpose: Insights from an emerging learning collaborative for outcomes-based partnerships

Lecture Theatre I

Data plays a key role in outcome-based partnerships. Those working on outcomes-based projects are generating an immense volume and variety of data. This brings new urgency to the task of navigating, connecting and sensemaking to unlock data to inform practice. 

In this session, we will explore the latest developments on data across two themes: the function of data stewardship and machine learning. Firstly, we will introduce a pioneering programme to support a global network of data stewards and discuss how this network can help unlock more data on social outcomes projects.

We will then consider the tantalising power of machine learning techniques to meet the challenges posed by an unwieldy volume of literature on outcomes contracting. There will be an interactive demonstration of a prototype evidence navigation tool designed to help practitioners and policy makers traverse the large body of evidence around outcomes-based contracts.

Participants will have the opportunity to provide feedback and have a say in how we move forward with these data initiatives.

Watch the recording of the session here.

Theme: Procurement and social value

Deep Dive 2.1 Outcomes are knotty for public procurement

Lecture Theatre I

Procuring services on an outcomes basis – instead of an activities basis – is different. This session explores these differences looking at market engagement, requirements specification, procurement procedures, tender evaluations, contract design, payments, contract modifications, and oversight from the perspective of public procurement professionals

Watch the recording of the session here.

Presentations

Engaging with diverse solutions in homelessness: Are governments missing the social value potential in alternative approaches?

A survey of Social Impact Bonds (SIBs) in homelessness space depicts how partnerships with the third sector organizations have predominantly focused on the housing first approach. Such approaches though form …

Opportunities for family farming through public procurement of food in Colombia

Public procurement of food is now a widely used practice in Latin America to include marginalised smallholder producers in local economies and supply chains and to address hunger and malnutrition …

“It can't be done here”; Challenging and changing service provision for Armed Forces Families

“It can’t be done here”, an oft-repeated phrase heard across UK military establishments, is the standard refrain towards developing innovative ideas to improve the lived experience or social outcomes of …

Social Outcomes Contracting in Europe -- Procurement Guide

This presentation will share highlights from the (forthcoming) Social Outcomes Contracting in Europe -- Procurement Guide published by the European Investment Bank on the European Investment Advisory Hub. Social Outcomes …

Financial scoring in outcomes-based procurement: pitfalls and best practices

In the outcomes-based commissioning ecosystem, significant attention has (rightly) been paid so far on the design of payment functions for implementers – choosing metrics, pricing outcomes and setting targets. Less …

Theme: Outcomes-based contracting

Deep Dive 2.2 Exploring the role of outcomes-based contracting for environmental management

Tun Razak Lecture Theatre

From net-zero carbon emissions to restoring biodiversity, recognition of the existential threat posed by climate change has led to a wide variety of commitments from governments, multilateral organisations, NGOs, and private enterprises. Achieving the desired aims will require innovation, more investment and more efficient spending, and greater partnership between the public and private sectors. What is the role of outcomes-based contracting (OBC) in this ‘green agenda’? This session aims to summarise the current state of environmental OBC and consolidate lessons learned from existing programmes.

Watch the recording of the session here.

Presentations

How can outcomes-based approaches contribute to positive environmental outcomes?

Improving the health of our planet is arguably the biggest challenge human-kind faces today. We need to restore the health of our land and oceans, capture harmful carbon from the …

Lessons from two years of the Green Outcomes Fund in South Africa

The Green Outcomes Fund is a first-of-its-kind climate finance structure which uses outcomes-based contracting to crowd in private capital investment. A key objective of the GOF is to support investment …

Development Impact Bond for Rhino Conservation: mobilizing $150 from private investors

In March 2022, the World Bank issued the $150 million Wildlife Conservation Bond (WCB). This development impact bond channels investor funds to achieve conservation outcomes measured by an increase in …

Using outcomes-based contracting to tackle the climate crisis: A systematic review of the evidence

Outcomes-based approaches to environmental management and climate change mitigation have been implemented in a variety of contexts, including waste management, agriculture, and energy. While a body of evidence about such …

Theme: Outcomes-based contracting

Deep Dive 2.3 Let’s be friends: outcomes contracts & relational contracting

Seminar Rooms 1&2

Outcomes-based contracts bring together parties from different backgrounds in a long-term partnership where collaboration is key. However, a more traditional, transactional approach to contracting may lack many of the features needed for success.

In this session, we’ll explore whether a "formal relational” approach to contracting might help to achieve better social outcomes.

Watch the recording of the session here.

Presentations

When things go wrong: Developing a contractual architecture for impact bonds that promotes resiliency

Impact bonds and other pay by results transactions share a focus on serving a designated beneficiary population, many of whom may be the least able to manage catastrophic risks and …

Best practice in delivering Social Impact Bonds (SIBs)/products; ‘It ain’t what you do, it’s the way that you do it (and that’s what get results)’

Central question and main issues analysed

Various commentators have seen Social Impact Bonds (SIBs) as implementing practices associated with New Public Management and/or neo liberal ideas (e.g. Dowling 2017, Warner …

Postmortem on a public sector contract collapse and welfare modernization failure

Government agencies have increasingly turned to complex multi-actor contracts and public-private partnerships (PPPs) to outsource social services. When these contracts do not deliver as promised, the consequences can be severe, …

Formal and informal relational practice in the Kirklees Better Outcomes Partnership contract

This presentation discusses a project governed by an outcomes-based contracting arrangement, the Kirklees Better Outcomes Partnership, through the lens of formal relational contracting. It analyses how relational aspects of the …

Partnerships with principles: putting relationships at the heart of public contracts for better social outcomes

Building on a practitioner focused guide being developed by the GO Lab, Michael and Nigel will share insights on the different reasons to take a more relational approach to contracting …

Theme: Outcomes-based contracting

The work never stops: how do we make social change stick? Lessons from outcomes-based partnerships and beyond

Lecture Theatre I

Outcomes-focused partnerships around the world come in many shapes and forms, but most are underpinned by an ambition to leave a lasting legacy that improves the ecosystem in which they operate.

Whether it’s through building a culture of trust and collaboration between organisations in different sectors, improving service delivery through data-driven learning and adaptative management, or working flexibly to innovate to maximise social impact, outcomes-focused partnerships have been seen as a promising way to address systemic delivery failures and strengthen institutional capacity within government. What are the mechanisms by which these outcomes-focused partnerships can help build institutional capacity? What are the limitations? What have we learnt from them about how to strengthen the design and implementation of social programmes? What can we learn from other approaches about how outcomes-focused approaches can have sustainability built-in from the start?

This discussion will bring together a rich mix of policymaker and practitioner perspectives from around the world for an in-depth exploration of the engines of impact that can strengthen the long-term legacy of outcomes-focused partnerships.

Watch the recording of the session here.

How do we make things happen on the ground? In conversation with Stefan Dercon

Lecture Theatre I

The announcement of a new public policy is always a moment that focuses attention. But what happens next? How does change actually take place – or not? How do we know it is indeed a positive change? And if it is, how is it made to stick?

In this public talk, GO Lab academic director Mara Airoldi will be hosting a discussion with Professor Stefan Dercon, Professor of Economic Policy at the Blavatnik School of Government. Prof Dercon has been conducting research and advising governments around the world for decades, working both as an academic professor and a senior policy advisor. He will share his insights on how to achieve mission alignment from senior stakeholders and shared commitment to action from those involved in the implementation, as well as building in timely learning practices. Please bring your burning questions and experiences on ways to link policy and delivery to achieve better outcomes.

About Professor Stefan Dercon

Professor Stefan Dercon combines his academic career with work as a policy advisor, providing strategic economic and development advice, and promoting the use of evidence in decision making. Between 2011 and 2017, he was Chief Economist of the Department of International Development (DFID), the government department in charge with the UK’s aid policy and spending. Since 2020, he has been the Development Policy Advisor to successive Foreign Secretaries at the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office. 

His research interests concern what keeps some people and countries poor: the failures of markets, governments and politics, mainly in Africa, and how to achieve change. 

His latest book, Gambling on Development: Why some countries win and others lose was published in May 2022. It draws on his academic research as well as his policy experience across three decades and 40-odd countries, exploring why some countries have managed to settle on elite bargains favouring growth and development, and others did not. Previously, Dull Disasters? How Planning Ahead Will Make A Difference  was published in 2016, and provides a blueprint for renewed application of science, improved decision making, better preparedness, and pre-arranged finance in the face of natural disasters.

Watch the recording of the session here.

Inamori Forum

Close of conference & drinks reception