chevron icon Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo YouTube logo download icon link icon audio icon quote icon posted icon clock icon author icon arrow icon arrow icon plus icon Search icon location icon location icon document icon menu icon plus-alt

General overview

Stage of development: Complete

Policy sector: Employment and training

Date outcomes contract signed: Mar 2020

Start date of service provision: Jul 2020

Anticipated completion date: Aug 2024

Capital raised (minimum): GBP 328k (USD 406.95k)

Max potential outcome payment: GBP 1.31m

Service users: 75 individuals

Intervention

Delivering services using Individual Placement and Support principles to clients with learning disabilities in Tower Hamlets.

Target population

People with learning disabilities

Location

Country

  • United Kingdom

Service delivery locations

  • Tower Hamlets

Involved organisations

Configuration of contracting parties:

  • Outcome payer holds contract with Mental Health and Employment Partnership limited (led by intermediary)

Commissioners/outcome payers

Service Providers

Investors

Intermediary organisations

Generating plot, please wait...

Outcome metrics

  • Metric 1: Engagement and completion of vocational profile
  • Metric 2: Job start
  • Metric 3: Job sustainment < 16 hours per week
  • Metric 4: Job sustainment > 16 hours per week

Results

This project started delivering services in April 2020 and will finish in August 2024. Data was last updated in December 2023. These are interim results.

Outcome achievements

Overall target is based on the high case scenario defined in the Life Chances Fund Final Award Offer or Variation Agreements.

Generating plot, please wait...

The intermediary organisation's comment on this graph:

'The metrics selected are in line with the IPS Grow key performance indicator framework, which was developed in collaboration with high fidelity UK IPS services. The metrics chosen represent a balance between achieving the 'key' outcome: entry into work, with a proxy measure for the quality of the outcome: how long the job is sustained.

MHEP provided an opportunity to trial IPS-style supported employment for those experiencing learning disabilities and/or autism. We have learnt that the support pipeline and desirable outcomes for this group are slightly different than the standard model for IPS. In particular, we've learnt that the conversion from engagements to job starts is much higher for this cohort, and that part time work tends to be a more preferable and sustainable job outcome than full-time work. We have also learnt that, generally, those experiencing learning disabilities require more intensive long-term in work support to sustain work compared to other cohorts.

As well as achieving the specified outcomes in each project, conversations with providers and commissioners have suggested that the SIB structure may have helped move provider/commissioner relationships beyond 'compliance' toward collaborative problem solving to achieve better outcomes for service users.'

Outcome payments

Generating plot, please wait...

The intermediary organisation's comment on this graph:

'In this project, MHEP receives outcomes payments for each outcome achieved. The Local Authority receives a block payment to deliver the service. The provider is paid in block, rather than for outcomes.

This project enabled us to pilot IPS-style supported employment with a new cohort. While much of what we learnt from other MHEP services was relevant, the contract design, outcomes metrics, and targets for each outcome all needed to be adapted to better meet the needs of those with learning disabilities. We learnt that SIBs need to expect and enable adaptation for pilots, even more so than in more established services, by, for example, considering new metrics, or shifting performance expectations as we learn what 'success' looks like.'

Linked resource by project's intermediary organisation:

https://golab.bsg.ox.ac.uk/documents/MHEP_full_report.pdf

Is this information correct?
Do you have more you can add?

Please tell us about it

Get in touch

Important Notice and Disclaimer on INDIGO Data

INDIGO data are shared for research and policy analysis purposes. INDIGO data can be used to support a range of insights, for example, to understand the social outcomes that projects aim to improve, the network of organisations across projects, trends, scales, timelines and summary information. The collaborative system by which we collect, process, and share data is designed to advance data-sharing norms, harmonise data definitions and improve data use. These data are NOT shared for auditing, investment, or legal purposes. Please independently verify any data that you might use in decision making. We provide no guarantees or assurances as to the quality of these data. Data may be inaccurate, incomplete, inconsistent, and/or not current for various reasons: INDIGO is a collaborative and iterative initiative that mostly relies on projects all over the world volunteering to share their data. We have a system for processing information and try to attribute data to named sources, but we do not audit, cross-check, or verify all information provided to us. It takes time and resources to share data, which may not have been included in a project’s budget. Many of the projects are ongoing and timely updates may not be available. Different people may have different interpretations of data items and definitions. Even when data are high quality, interpretation or generalisation to different contexts may not be possible and/or requires additional information and/or expertise. Help us improve our data quality: email us at indigo@bsg.ox.ac.uk if you have data on new projects, changes or performance updates on current projects, clarifications or corrections on our data, and/or confidentiality or sensitivity notices. Please also give input via the INDIGO Data Definitions Improvement Tool and INDIGO Feedback Questionnaire.