Resource ID: INDIGO-ARES-0104
A useful guide for how to decide the commissioning model for an evaluation.
Has a really good bibliography in the back with notes on how different sources might be useful.
This guide is intended to support partnerships delivering the BigLF’s Fulfilling
Lives: Supporting people with multiple needs initiative in their commissioning
of local-level independent evaluations. It outlines the key stages in
commissioning evaluations and identifies some issues for partnerships to
consider during the planning stages of commissioning and therefore should not
be regarded as a comprehensive guide to commissioning. Further sources of
information are given at the end of the document.
Impact goal: Health, Defence, Housing, Agnostic, Democracy, Education, Well being, SDG oriented, Social impact, Local rejuvenation, Sustainability eco, Development poverty reduction, Employment financial well being
Internal/external: Internal
Leader: University of Sheffield
Method: Framework agnostic
Output format: Qualitative only
Scale: Meso
Sourcing: Self driven
Time frame: Prospective
Type: Guide
Used in sectors: Charity, Governance policy, Social enterprises, Developed countries
Who: Third sector, Public sector
INDIGO data are shared for research and policy analysis purposes. INDIGO data can be used to support a range of insights, for example, to understand the social outcomes that projects aim to improve, the network of organisations across projects, trends, scales, timelines and summary information. The collaborative system by which we collect, process, and share data is designed to advance data-sharing norms, harmonise data definitions and improve data use. These data are NOT shared for auditing, investment, or legal purposes. Please independently verify any data that you might use in decision making. We provide no guarantees or assurances as to the quality of these data. Data may be inaccurate, incomplete, inconsistent, and/or not current for various reasons: INDIGO is a collaborative and iterative initiative that mostly relies on projects all over the world volunteering to share their data. We have a system for processing information and try to attribute data to named sources, but we do not audit, cross-check, or verify all information provided to us. It takes time and resources to share data, which may not have been included in a project’s budget. Many of the projects are ongoing and timely updates may not be available. Different people may have different interpretations of data items and definitions. Even when data are high quality, interpretation or generalisation to different contexts may not be possible and/or requires additional information and/or expertise. Help us improve our data quality: email us at indigo@bsg.ox.ac.uk if you have data on new projects, changes or performance updates on current projects, clarifications or corrections on our data, and/or confidentiality or sensitivity notices. Please also give input via the INDIGO Data Definitions Improvement Tool and INDIGO Feedback Questionnaire.